http://breakingnews.ie/ireland/libertas-ganley-may-run-in-election-490799.html
Will he never go away.
Playing hard to get - peekaboo like some political Paris Hilton.
Perhaps the laziness of most journos is feeding his confidence.
And perhaps Declan sees a nice little 'I told you so!' niche.
See Lisbon didn't make you rich. And Mr Populist has got away with dancing on the public's anger about the cosy cartel of bankers politicians and devleopers.
A cosy cartel that is now symbolised by the tent at the Galway races.
Declan can articulate this anger well.
Cos after all he has some inside knowledge.
Sure wasn't he one of the attendees back in the day.
And the bankers. Oh yes.
They wouldn't perhaps include the golden circle at Anglo - those who, skating on thin legal ice and certainly taking a wide boy view of morality, borrowed from their bank in unusually tailored manners, to buy into and boost the share price of Anglo.
Why?
Cos the whole corrupt house of cards was about to come crumbling down and take the country with it.
And how did Libertas view this behaviour?
Behaviour that has subsequently seen words like treason being bandied about.
Well we only have Ganley's partner in ....Libertas's view at the moment, Ulick McEvaddy.
Ulick McEvaddy - a man, who like Declan ,makes his money primarily from US defence contracts - what did he do?
Rail against the injustice, rage against the burden that was surely going to be shouldered by the innocent little man, scream for regulation, demand the destruction of the corrupt incestuous nexus of bankers/developers/politicians.
No.
Ulick had a different take.
Unlike the crooks in Fianna Fail who at least pretended in public to be shocked and ashamed - Ulick spoke out with honesty, showing his true colours.
What, in his words, were the Anglo golden circle?
"Heroes".
I kid you fcuking not.
"Heroes".
"Heroes" in what?
In an economic war.
So the Libertas big whig saw the scenario as "war".
Against whom?
Us against Them.
"Treason" starts to sound inadequate to describe the panoramic scope of the treachery.
Anything to say about that Declan?
Come on, Declan.
Explain how the top ten were 'heroes"
Good old Ulick
At least he's up front.
So we know he's an enemy of the people.
Open this month's pay packet and look at how much has gone to pay for those "heroic" exploits.
Will he never go away.
Playing hard to get - peekaboo like some political Paris Hilton.
Perhaps the laziness of most journos is feeding his confidence.
And perhaps Declan sees a nice little 'I told you so!' niche.
See Lisbon didn't make you rich. And Mr Populist has got away with dancing on the public's anger about the cosy cartel of bankers politicians and devleopers.
A cosy cartel that is now symbolised by the tent at the Galway races.
Declan can articulate this anger well.
Cos after all he has some inside knowledge.
Sure wasn't he one of the attendees back in the day.
And the bankers. Oh yes.
They wouldn't perhaps include the golden circle at Anglo - those who, skating on thin legal ice and certainly taking a wide boy view of morality, borrowed from their bank in unusually tailored manners, to buy into and boost the share price of Anglo.
Why?
Cos the whole corrupt house of cards was about to come crumbling down and take the country with it.
And how did Libertas view this behaviour?
Behaviour that has subsequently seen words like treason being bandied about.
Well we only have Ganley's partner in ....Libertas's view at the moment, Ulick McEvaddy.
Ulick McEvaddy - a man, who like Declan ,makes his money primarily from US defence contracts - what did he do?
Rail against the injustice, rage against the burden that was surely going to be shouldered by the innocent little man, scream for regulation, demand the destruction of the corrupt incestuous nexus of bankers/developers/politicians.
No.
Ulick had a different take.
Unlike the crooks in Fianna Fail who at least pretended in public to be shocked and ashamed - Ulick spoke out with honesty, showing his true colours.
What, in his words, were the Anglo golden circle?
"Heroes".
I kid you fcuking not.
"Heroes".
"Heroes" in what?
In an economic war.
So the Libertas big whig saw the scenario as "war".
Against whom?
Us against Them.
"Treason" starts to sound inadequate to describe the panoramic scope of the treachery.
Anything to say about that Declan?
Come on, Declan.
Explain how the top ten were 'heroes"
Good old Ulick
At least he's up front.
So we know he's an enemy of the people.
Open this month's pay packet and look at how much has gone to pay for those "heroic" exploits.
0 comments:
Post a Comment